Conformal Coatings
Technical Needs, Gaps and Solutions
This section covers technology issues surrounding Conformal Coatings, the associated needs, technology status of those needs, as well as gaps and challenges to overcome, are summarized below in Table 1. The time period considered is from 2024 to 2034. Assessments of to address these gaps and challenges is presented in Table 2 as a set of potential solutions for each set of issues.
Technology Status Legend
For each need, the status of today’s technology is indicated by label and color as follows:
In-table color + label key | Description of Technology Status |
---|---|
Solutions not known | Solutions not known at this time |
Solutions need optimization | Current solutions need optimization |
Solutions deployed or known | Solutions deployed or known today |
Not determined | TBD |
Table 1. Conformal Coatings Gaps, and Today’s Technology Status with Respect to Current and Future Needs
TECHNOLOGY ISSUE | ROADMAP TIMEFRAME | |||
Conformal Coatings | ||||
TODAY (2024) | 3 YEARS (2027) | 5 YEARS (2029) | 10 YEARS (2034) | |
CONFORMAL COATING ISSUE #1: Development and application of nano-coatings to account for miniaturization trends (environmentally friendly, sustainable coatings, such as sustainable nano-coating) | ||||
NEED | More development of nano-coating Optimization of nano-coating | |||
CURRENT TECHNOLOGY STATUS | Solutions need optimization | |||
Development of halogen-free (Cl + Br) including PFAS and other fluorinated materials free. | ||||
GAP | Not many coatings available
| |||
CHALLENGE | Define/ development of more commercially viable coatings. Ever changing regulations. | |||
CONFORMAL COATING ISSUE #2: Need non-fluorinated high temperature conformal coatings substitutes (PFAS) | ||||
NEED | Replacement of current PFAS coating with non-PFAS coating while still maintaining the same high temperature properties (up to 350°C) | |||
CURRENT TECHNOLOGY STATUS | Solutions not known | |||
No replacements available. | ||||
GAP | Development of these materials. No ideal coating to meet the thermal requirements. | |||
CHALLENGE | Few options available and they are unproven/ not suitable. Ever changing regulations. | |||
CONFORMAL COATING ISSUE #3: Coverage of conformal coating (low coating thicknesses) (application and material related issue) | ||||
NEED | More uniform conformal coating for the low thicknesses (process related) |
| ||
CURRENT TECHNOLOGY STATUS | Solutions need optimization | |||
|
| |||
GAP | Need conformability (every area is covered with the same thickness). Current standards need to be amended to call out material uniformity on 3D topology. | |||
CHALLENGE | Finding the right material which will provide uniform coverage | |||
CONFORMAL COATING ISSUE #4: Ability to test after conformal coating application | ||||
NEED | Ensuring the presence and property of conformal coating | |||
CURRENT TECHNOLOGY STATUS | Solutions need optimization | |||
| ||||
GAP | No current standard to do this type of testing which would include testing of electrical and mechanical properties of a thin coating after application. | |||
CHALLENGE | Development of applicable and verifiable test standards for industry to use for all coating types. | |||
CONFORMAL COATING ISSUE #5: Non-silicone CC (new type of CC or hybrid CC (2 layers of CC)- maybe a new category of CC) that can withstand 150°C to 175°C (For Automotive) | ||||
NEED | Need to move away from silicone materials. Health and safety along with housekeeping (Cleanliness concerns in factory /contamination concerns) |
|
| |
CURRENT TECHNOLOGY STATUS | Solutions need optimization |
|
| |
There are non-silicone CC available which can withstand 150°C to 175°C for automotive. |
|
| ||
GAP | Limited choices |
|
| |
CHALLENGE | Finding base chemistries that fit both high temperature that are commercially viable |
|
| |
CONFORMAL COATING ISSUE #6: Need more development and application of nano-coatings to account for miniaturization trends (recyclable coatings) | ||||
NEED | Recyclable nano-coatings | |||
CURRENT TECHNOLOGY STATUS | Solutions need optimization | |||
Limited options at present | ||||
GAP | Not enough nano materials options at present to evaluate and develop | |||
CHALLENGE | Finding the correct material that can be recycled |
Approaches to address Needs, Gaps and Challenges
Table 2 considers approaches to address the above needs and challenges. The evolution of these is projected out over a 10-year timeframe using technology readiness levels (TRLs).
In-table color key | Range of Technology Readiness Levels | Description |
---|---|---|
2 | TRL: 1 to 4 | Levels involving research |
6 | TRL: 5 to 7 | Levels involving development |
9 | TRL: 8 to 9 | Levels involving deployment |
Table 2. Conformal Coatings Potential Solutions
TECHNOLOGY ISSUE | EXPECTED TRL LEVEL* | ||||
Conformal Coatings | POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS | TODAY (2024) | 3 (2027) | 5 (2029) | 10 |
CONFORMAL COATING: ISSUE #1 | Development of novel chemistries and processes | 4 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
CONFORMAL COATING: ISSUE #2 | Development of novel chemistries’ | 4 | 5 | 6 | 8 |
CONFORMAL COATING: ISSUE #3 | Development of novel chemistries and processes | 4 | 5 | 6 | 8 |
CONFORMAL COATING: ISSUE #4 | Development of novel processes and testing using hand-held and spectrometry-based tools | 5 | 6 | 7 | 9 |
CONFORMAL COATING: ISSUE #5 | Development of novel chemistries | 5 | 5 | 8 | 9 |
CONFORMAL COATING: ISSUE #6 | Development of novel chemistries and processes | 3 | 4 | 5 | 8 |
Conclusions
Need more development and application of nano-coatings to account for miniaturization trends (environmentally friendly, sustainable coatings)
Need non-fluorinated high temperature conformal coatings (PFAS)
Need better coverage of conformal coating (for low coating thicknesses) (application and material related issues)
Board Assembly Acronyms
Return to Assembly Materials.