SMT Reflow
Technical Needs, Gaps and Solutions
SMT Reflow technology issues, the associated needs, technology status of those needs, as well as gaps and challenges to overcome, are summarized below. A total of 11 issues are reviewed in the area of reflow. The time period considered is from 2024 to 2034.
Technology Status Legend
For each need, the status of today’s technology is indicated by label and color as follows:
In-table color + label key | Description of Technology Status |
---|---|
Solutions not known | Solutions not known at this time |
Solutions need optimization | Current solutions need optimization |
Solutions deployed or known | Solutions deployed or known today |
Not determined | TBD |
Table 1. SMT Reflow: Needs, Gaps, and Today’s Technology Status with Respect to Current and Future Needs
| ROADMAP TIMEFRAME | |||
TECHNOLOGY ISSUE | TODAY (2024) | 3 YEARS (2027) | 5 YEARS (2029) | 10 YEARS (2034) |
ISSUE #1 More AOI machines behind reflow machines so exit temperature for board from reflow oven has to be less than 50°C (actual temperature based on AOI equipment supplier requirements) (OSHA calls for 60°C) (Room temperature 25°C) (Cameras in automated optical inspection (AOI) cannot handle high temperatures) (This also covers double-sided boards) | ||||
NEED | More cooling capacity needed. (Need integration of cooling fans with oven). Increased number of cooling zones to 6 increases oven footprint by ~50%. Or allow higher allowable temperature into AOI. | Need to improve efficiency of cooling. Aim for 3°C/sec. | Need to improve efficiency of cooling Aim for 4°C/sec. | |
CURRENT TECHNOLOGY STATUS | Solutions Need Optimization | |||
GAP | Most reflow ovens have a limited number of cooling zones (need more cooling zones) (Product size differences and conveyor speed requirements) (Need to add external cooling units (fans) on top of oven behind reflow oven before AOI machines.) | Limited by the cooling rate of the components (<6°C/sec). Limited by the footprint of the oven in the factory Current cooling rate for components on large boards is around 2°C/sec.. | ||
CHALLENGES |
| |||
ISSUE #2 Large boards with heavy fixtures. | ||||
NEED | Some ovens are vapor phase to address this concern. Have longer ovens to reduce this effect (increased preheat) | Longer ovens (up to 30% heating length) to reduce this effect (increased preheat) Longer preheat or higher capacity heating capability. | Longer ovens (up to 40% heating length) to reduce this effect (increased preheat) Longer preheat or higher capacity heating capability. | Longer ovens (up to 50% heating length) to reduce this effect (increased preheat) Longer preheat or higher capacity heating capability. |
CURRENT TECHNOLOGY STATUS | Solutions Need Optimization | |||
GAP | - | - | - | - |
CHALLENGE | Heating and cooling of large thermal mass product has effects on solder paste reflow and ovens (10 kg product plus fixture loads). | |||
NEED | Cover small components so they will not go over temperature. Use of special fixture to cover small components and protect from hot air from oven (e.g., IBM work) | |||
CURRENT TECHNOLOGY STATUS | Solutions not known | |||
GAP | Lack of a better medium with a better heat transfer (for vapor phase reflow- smaller components are heated for too long (increased TAL- solder joint issue) even though not a very high temperature) | |||
CHALLENGE | Challenge to heat big and small components at the same time and temperature that results in smaller components are overheated on board (flux charring). | |||
ISSUE #3 Demand for higher throughput/ conveyor speed ovens (Longer ovens to meet process time/ throughput) | ||||
NEED | Higher throughput. Some 18-zone heating, 6-zone cooling ovens available | Higher throughput. Some 18-zone heating, 6-zone cooling ovens available. More machines will have double 3 to 4 lanes to reduce floorspace. | ||
CURRENT TECHNOLOGY STATUS | Solutions Need Optimization | |||
GAP | Lack of optimum reflow oven setup for higher throughput with smaller footprint (increased use of conveyors) | |||
CHALLENGE | Achieving a smaller oven with a smaller footprint, e.g., vertical reflow ovens (one option used in the past) | |||
ISSUE #4 Confusion over the oven number of zones versus oven zone length for the user. Have a general guideline to define heated and cooling lengths. | ||||
NEED | Need to define the optimum ratio of the heated or cooling zone length in combination with the number of zones to make an accurate reflow profile. | |||
CURRENT TECHNOLOGY STATUS | Solutions Need Optimization | |||
GAP | Lack of a standard and/or guideline definition of a required ratio for heating or cooling | |||
CHALLENGE | None | |||
ISSUE #5 Need low voiding during reflow, which will affect reflow oven throughput (e.g., for MOSFET type and bottom terminated components (BTC) components) (Look at types of heating zone methods to address this) | ||||
NEED | Lower voiding with vacuum ovens. (Could be vacuum in vapor phase oven and vacuum in convection ovens) | |||
CURRENT TECHNOLOGY STATUS | Solutions Need Optimization | |||
GAP | Vacuum chamber size is small. Time to reach vacuum is very slow and affects product throughput. | |||
CHALLENGE |
| |||
ISSUE #6 Vacuum/ Vapor (Formic acid/ Hydrogen atmosphere) phase oven contamination effect of flux chemistry on reflow oven - Maintenance requirements) (Vapor phase) | ||||
NEED | Improve flux collection system of oven | More efficient and robust collection system. Less Maintenance. | ||
CURRENT TECHNOLOGY STATUS | Solutions Need Optimization | |||
GAP | Lack of maintenance. (Weekly maintenance is currently 10 to 12 hours maintenance). Chamber has to be opened to clean flux. Lack of efficient collection systems. | Development/ improvement of flux collection systems (improvement and re-design). | ||
CHALLENGE | Mix of different pastes in vacuum/ vapor phase oven. Vacuum is used intermittently so flux is collected in chamber more when vacuum is off, which increases flux amount in chamber. | |||
CHALLENGE |
| Updating existing equipment will be a challenge. | ||
ISSUE #7 Improve flux extraction and removal for convection ovens | ||||
NEED | Improving extraction and removal to reduce oven maintenance and machine downtime | Effective removal (60% removal) of reflowed flux fumes from the chamber to a collection system with no need to open the chamber. (Extraction and removal are two separate terms: | Effective removal (80% removal) of reflowed flux fumes from the chamber to a collection system. No need to open the chamber. The objective is to reduce oven maintenance and machine downtime. | Effective removal (90% removal) of reflowed flux fumes from the chamber to a collection system. No need to open the chamber. The objective is to reduce oven maintenance and machine downtime. |
CURRENT TECHNOLOGY STATUS | Solutions Need Optimization | |||
GAPS |
| How to extract flux from chamber without affecting the dynamics of the heating system and O2 level in nitrogen atmosphere if used. | ||
CHALLENGE | Modes of extraction of flux residue from air atmosphere vary. Maintenance of the dynamics of the heating system. | |||
ISSUE #8 Need to have different types of heating methods to reduce Delta T between small and large components. (Large Delta T implies overheating of small components.) | ||||
NEED | Reduce Delta T between small and large components (<5°C to <15°C Delta T and limited time over liquidus). Explore different types of heating (Convection, radiation, conduction vapor) | Reduce Delta T between small and large components (<5°C to <15°C Delta T and limited time over liquidus). Explore different types of heating (Convection, radiation, conduction vapor) including hybrid technologies. | ||
CURRENT TECHNOLOGY STATUS | Solutions Need Optimization | Solutions not known | ||
GAP | Development of different types of equipment is still in progress. Can not meet Delta T requirements for overall assembly or in some cases the smaller components have overheating. | |||
CHALLENGE | Implementing low delta T equipment in production lines with no increased cost is a challenge. Some large board designs with large thermal mass are particularly challenging. Thermal modelling for DFM may help. | |||
CHALLENGE | For vapor phase preheating is a concern. Tendency for tombstoning of chip component with vapor phase. | N/A | ||
ISSUE #9 Sustainability and energy consumption for reflow ovens (Less N2, power etc) (Lower carbon footprint) | ||||
NEED | Reduce power, N2 use and purity of N2 use and N2 leakage. Need more efficient heating and reduced temperature loss (insulation, etc.) through power/ N2 idle/ saving modes, reduced power motors. | |||
CURRENT TECHNOLOGY STATUS | Solutions Need Optimization | |||
GAP | Inability to keeping power low while still needing to heat board in a sufficient time | |||
CHALLENGE | Balance between lowering power consumption and maintaining production volumes is difficult when transitioning from a heavy product with hot program to a small product with lower heat. Changeover time is long. | |||
ISSUE #10 Equipment and assembly materials compatibility (flux management system). | ||||
NEED | Equipment capable of managing the use of different flux materials, to reduce maintenance intervals and thereby reducing cleaning. | Equipment capable of managing the use of different flux materials to reduce maintenance intervals. Self-cleaning of the machine. | ||
CURRENT TECHNOLOGY STATUS | Solutions Need Optimization | |||
Condensation and catalysts to collect volatiles from flux. Scrubbing is required for proper cleaning. | ||||
GAPS |
|
|
| Elimination of solder mask and flux management |
CHALLENGES |
| |||
ISSUE #11 Standardization of oxygen level used in oven. Reduce N2 consumption to reduce operational cost. Atmosphere control (maintaining O2 levels in a certain range in the oven) (ppm of O2 Levels: below 100 ppm- more tombstoning) (Target- 200-500 ppm O2) (Range varies by customer: some customers use 1000-2000 ppm O2). | ||||
NEED | Maintain O2 levels to customers’ requirements while reducing N2 consumption. Provide industry guideline on N2 usage in terms of use and O2 ppm level guideline (e.g., place this information into IPC J-STD-001 handbook). Have a level of N2 and how much N2 flow is needed to maintain that level. | Maintain O2 levels to customer requirement. Provide industry guideline on N2 usage in terms of use and O2 ppm level guideline. For 1000 ppm O2- equivalent to 350 slpm | Maintain O2 levels to customer requirement. Provide industry guideline on N2 usage in terms of use and O2 ppm level guideline. For 1000 ppm O2- equivalent to 325 slpm | Maintain O2 levels to customer requirement. Provide industry guideline on N2 usage in terms of use and O2 ppm level guideline. For 1000 ppm O2- equivalent to < 300 slpm |
CURRENT TECHNOLOGY STATUS
| Solutions Need Optimization | |||
Some machines have this capability but a majority of the system has a manual system of control. With manual system if production is stopped then the N2 level may go out of control as the machines have idle mode. If there is no production, fans may reduce in speed and N2 may be reduced. The other method is reduction in N2 introduction. N2 flow/ consumption/ hour- CuM/ hr or liter/min- | ||||
GAPS |
| |||
CHALLENGES |
|
Approaches to address SMT Reflow Needs, Gaps and Challenges
Table 2 considers approaches to address the above needs and challenges. The evolution of these is projected out over a 10-year timeframe using technology readiness levels (TRLs).
In-table color key | Range of Technology Readiness Levels | Description |
---|---|---|
2 | TRL: 1 to 4 | Levels involving research |
6 | TRL: 5 to 7 | Levels involving development |
9 | TRL: 8 to 9 | Levels involving deployment |
Table 2. SMT Reflow Potential Solutions
|
| EXPECTED TRL LEVEL* | |||
TECHNOLOGY ISSUE | POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS | TODAY (2024) | 3 (2027) | 5 (2029) | 10 |
ISSUE #1 More AOI machines behind reflow machines so exit temperature for board from reflow oven has to be less than 50C (actual temperature based on AOI equipment supplier requirements) (OSHA calls for 60C) (Room temperature 25C) (Cameras in AOI cannot handle high temperatures) (This also covers double-sided boards)
| More cooling capacity | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
Increased number of cooling zones (to 6 cooling zones) | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
Increased length | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
ISSUE #2 Large boards with heavy fixtures Smaller components are overheated on board (flux charring)
| Fixtures with lower thermal mass and relatively cost (which would reduce the need for shielding of smaller components) | 3 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
Improved ability of reflow oven to heat up and cool down (increased thermal and cooling capacity) | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
Better design of large boards so fixtures are limited in use
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
Better fixture design for large boards | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
ISSUE # 3 Demand for higher throughout/ conveyor speed ovens with smaller footprint (Longer ovens to meet process time/ throughput)
| Horizontal integration ovens (multiple lanes or chambers) | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
Vertical integration ovens (curing applications) | 8 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
Vertical integration ovens (soldering applications) | 2 | 3 | 5 | 8 | |
ISSUE # 4 Confusion over the oven number of zones versus oven zone length for the user. Have a general guideline to define heated and cooling lengths. | Create standard definition/ guideline for the user | 3 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
ISSUE #5 Need low voiding during reflow which will affect reflow oven throughput (e.g for MOSFET type and BTC components) | Improved vacuum oven throughput | 6 | 6 | 7 | 8
|
Reduced vacuum oven size | 7 | 7 | 8 | 8 | |
Low maintenance/ reduced downtime of vacuum oven | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
Optimization of reflow profile to reduce voiding | 6 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
ISSUE # 6 Vacuum/ Vapor (Formic acid/ Hydrogen atmosphere) phase oven contamination. Effect of flux chemistry on reflow oven - Maintenance requirements) (Vapor phase) | Improved flux collection system of oven | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
ISSUE # 7 Improve Flux extraction and removal for convection ovens | Fume extraction from chamber | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
Flux removal from the fume | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
ISSUE #8 Need to have different types of heating methods to reduce delta T between small and large components. Large delta T implies overheating of small components. | Development of hybrid heating solution (e.g., convection with, radiation, conduction with vapor technology) | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 |
ISSUE # 9 Sustainability and energy consumption for reflow ovens (Less N2, power etc) (Lower Carbon footprint) | Reduce N2 use and purity of N2 use and less N2 leakage.
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
Reduce power | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
ISSUE # 10 Equipment and assembly materials compatibility (flux management system). Lot of cleaning needed. | Equipment to be able to manage the use of different flux materials (including solder mask). (Convection reflow) | 6 | 7 | 8 | 8 |
Reduce maintenance interval. Self-cleaning of the machine. (Conventional reflow) | 6 | 7 | 8 | 8 | |
Equipment to be able to manage the use of different flux materials (including solder mask). (Vapor phase reflow) | 6 | 7 | 8 | 8 | |
Reduce maintenance interval. Self-cleaning of the machine. (Vapor phase reflow) | 7 | 8 | 8 | 8 | |
ISSUE #11 Standardization of oxygen level used in oven. Reduce N2 consumption to reduce operational cost. Atmosphere control (maintaining O2 levels in a certain range in the oven) (ppm O2 Levels: below 100ppm- more tombstoning) (Target- 200-500ppm O2) (Range varies by customer: some customers use 1000-2000ppm O2). | Development of standard/ guideline (IPC or other organization) for recommended oxygen level in oven). | 4 | 5 | 7 | 8 |
Conclusions
Reflow continues to be a challenging area in electronics assembly operations due to the increased miniaturization and densification of components and assemblies. There are many key issues in reflow, which include the following:
Demand for higher throughout/conveyor speed ovens (Longer ovens to meet process time and throughput)
Need low voiding during reflow which will affect reflow oven throughput (e.g., for MOSFET type and BTC components) (Need to look at the types of heating zone methods to address this challenge)
Vacuum/vapor (Formic acid/hydrogen atmosphere) phase oven contamination. Effect of flux chemistry on reflow oven and maintenance requirements.
Improve flux extraction and removal for convection ovens
Need to have different types of heating methods to address reducing Delta T between small and large components (<5°C to <15°C Delta T and limiting time over liquidus). This causes overheating of small components.
Sustainability and energy consumption for reflow ovens (Need for less N2, power consumption, etc. and a lower carbon footprint).
It is important to understand that as designs produce assemblies with miniaturized components with tighter component spacings and with the advent of larger components, the challenges for reflow are increasing and will continue to increase in the future. Reflow equipment manufacturers continue to research equipment, materials, designs and methods to address the challenges faced in this area.
References
TA Luft. “First General Administrative Regulation Pertaining the Federal Emission Control Act (Technical Instructions on Air Quality Control.” 2002. https://www.euromot.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/GERMAN_TA_Luft_Technical_Instruction_on_Air_Quality_Control_2002-07-24.pdf.
Board Assembly Acronyms
Return to Surface Mount Technology Overview.